isa
522
.AKIHO QUA LAMBD
.bind jzadfið ya
x
I
I
X
+
platzTebianosat tɛom saldo ao tBUTİŞ BA TOJJAN TAV o1t al
66.j ebeneṛst-itus bas daktizü-itna ezon galed omit odd mot ms i
dtkw coltɔemos evitataquod mieid of sub al aiựt
x
„Jual Ist aid al zaw edit
I
X
•
odt JBalaga,aluano0 nemzed tankega obezit s osla zi szett
ostvṛea eft ni ton afstotilo asmeƉ" revo bra,æsitaged momTOR ebuzit edt to TetosTAKO NAT .*saiƒd 10 tud TaŻmuɔɔ (wo zieńt to azizsed to iste beasidau edi elan of davons at evoda beal!Juo "deer of Ibar ki yaamalqib namzeð" bisa el 31 nedy tu8 czebnow eKo , Jsolemnifi and to af fuelong and lo mudra edt bao .bajjizmos asd noltaged namreð eit Banndalino) Jadw
I
I
I
•
ELJASTUU VALDIER ONA JA_1_10
.Jetsonood edt în qotib edt of
would engage to remain neutral. I replied that I could not say
that; our hands were still free, and we were considering what
our attitude should be. All I could say was that our attitude
would be determined largely by public opinion here, and that the
neutrality of Belgium would appeal very strongly to public
opinion here. I did not think that we could give a promise of
neutrality on that condition alone. The Ambassador pressed me
as to whether I could not formulate conditions on which we would
remain neutral. He even suggested that the integrity of France
and her colonies might be guaranteed. I said that I felt obliged
to refuse definitely any promise to remain neutral on similar
terms, and I could only say that we must keep our hands free".
in
In the present state of affairs I wish to make no comment on
this statement beyond this: that later on it may be regretted that
Sir Edward Gray made no response to the urgent request of the
German Ambassador that he would formulate conditions for England's
neutrality, and that it seems a pity that when Mr. Asquith,
his speech on the 7th instant denounced the earlier tentative
proposals of Germany as "this infamous proposal", he should have
made no allusion to this later idea, to which no such words
could have been applied.
dið eit ao venit adt at betangga tad? Yin-dua edið al -,z18 -jsequel souebnoqaertod",(KIRI) & .ok tegal etid sit to tanteat Jeon ed to ero ɔt cotevila oa al erødt,"atalı0 asszozva and gai aɔttsoiauNROD & ,8££ .ok od velez I .Etneavcob act to Jastaval
.I teugua no asdoɛod .a við of yenə brawhā zib to ¿Tedtedy om beles" robscended asmted mid nyan að ekið al
OVEJILATŻven naigież stałoży od tan valanzy B AVAS YES INTO () \ & Lưów
it
I remain,
Yours truly,
William S. Clark.
Street, Somerset, August 12, 1914.
This, then, is clear, that Belgian neutrality formed but an
excuse for Great Britain drawing the aword. Then asked by the
German Ambassador whether Germany's guarantee of Belgium's neu-
trality would satisfy, no, even more when urgently asked to
state /
A
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.